Should we allow ai onto the site?

I did have some extra thoughts on AI.

The biggest problem that all these boomer investors do not notice while pouring gasoline on billions of dollars stems from AI's architecture, i.e., that AI is a token prediction model. 

It has learned that "I am eating" will be followed with "an apple" not because it understands what this means, but simply because in a text it is more likely to see "I am eating" being followed with "an apple."

In fact the word 'AI' is a hoax. The 'AI' implies its intelligence, which it does not posses. It is all build on the fake promise of 'creating the AGI, creating the artificial consciousness, BS, that is driving billions of dollars into this DEAD END "industry".

It does not comprehend anything. When it writes, when it creates, it ends up generating awfully mediocre things.
Code that looks good, but as soon as you ask it to generate a project big enough it won't ever launch.
Text that "sounds deep" but is full of meaningless words. (Ever notice how many freaking useless adjectives such as 'fundamental' 'insightful' this BS slop generator fills any freaking sentance with?
Art which at first glance "looks good," but in reality it has a lot of things that professional artists would see as wrong at first glance.
Modern AI is the definition of mediocrity.
Really, it is like a student who was assigned something, and tries to copy paste some stuff from wiki.

And I find it insulting. I find it insulting when some piece of crap says "you can be replaced by the AI."
they imply that a faux, a replica of you, a'cramming student ', can replace the skill and effort and the understanding you have accumulated through endless practise. I find it insulting that knowledge can be replaced with "sounding smart," etc. Insulted that artwork that was well thought, projected, and made is not only compared to this shit (which already is insulting enough) but also sometimes said to be "superior" to the actual art.

So the question is actually formulated like this: should we have the actual videos in which thought and work were put (and it shows) or should we have a distorted empty shell of said videos instead of them?
It is like a choice between an apple and a wax apple.
They look similar but the second does not fill your stomach.
AI content MUST be labeled as an AI content, and better if we do not have it at all.
 

i dont really look at ai porn so it doesnt matter to me. most people ive seen say no so it probably shouldnt be allowed

Fuck no were not letting AI on here.

We gotta support ethical gooning.

No

The illusion of choice smh

No. But its not like our opinion will matter

Glad to see the community united for once ( except the new guy fuck him)

Hell to the fuck no

We will crucify you

OVER OUR DEAD BODIES. 

N. O.

God no, AI porn slop is such copypasta, generic dogshit that I actually feel embarrassed when I see people online post that shit thinking it's good. It's even more embarrassing when game devs try to to their usual pitch of subbing to their patreons while loudly and proudly using AI. Atp, why not just go to the ai company itself to jerk off???

This bubble needs to implode like 3 years ago

nah

only time I agree with that rat nigga greenfeld, HELL NO.

No, never.